In Touch Weekly: Jennifer Aniston DID “Steal” Justin Theroux
August 18, 2011 by Hollywoodite
In Touch Weekly has all guns blazing in the direction of Jennifer Aniston, this week.
It’s interesting, this isn’t a particularly current story. A bunch of tabloids have been bashing her/ them for weeks. ITW they gets its “exclusive” whenever it gets it. But it could have pushed this story out… whenever. And it’s come out now. After the couple ceased to be front-of-mind and after people got over the controversy (a few of the tabloids tried HARD, this week and last week, to find any similarities between Jolieroux just to make the story happen… and that’s ignoring the fake wedding/ fake pregnancy stories).
This is, not that it matters too much to ITW, the week before Kim Kardashian’s wedding. Only two of the big tabloids bothered to give Kardashian her own cover this week: OK! and L&S, Star made her share with Christina Aguilera and Jessica Simpson. But Aniston’s on ITW’s cover, one week after most tabloids already got their fill about the same story. ITW claims to have confirmation about cheating from a supposed friend. So this is a little juicer than the random hypothesising of last week.
ITW has a couple of ludicrous headlines on its cover: “Justin’s Ex Warns Jen: Hooked On Mr Wrong… His criminal past, How he cruelly mocked Jen, He’ll never be faithful… His ex: He lied to my face.”
First things first, according to Jezebel.com’s tabloid round-up, the criminal past thing amounts to this: “Theroux was arrested for vandalism when he was 12 and Jen finds his early adolescent life of crime totally foreign and a little scary.” LOL, okay. Moving swiftly on, Heidi Bivens, the live-in ex-girlfriend of 14-years reportedly thinks Aniston/ Theroux are doomed in their relationship. And she’s still hurt that he dumped her after meeting Aniston while he and Bivens were living together. The source offers more… “Justin will never marry [Jennifer]. He’s not the marrying type, as you can see from the 14-year relationship he was in that didn’t end in marriage. He is not the kind of guy to be owned.” Moreover, when they “met and fell in love” Theroux was “very taken” with Bivens. Also, “This is the guy [Jennifer] wants to grow old with… She is head over heels in love with him. [But] Jen is the complete opposite of Justin. She’s all about Malibu and shopping and trying to stay young while Justin is about being an artist.” And their tastes are different, as though that matters with two adults, “The last place Jen would want to go in New York would be a dive bar [where Justin would prefer to spend his free time].”
There’s more, Star is still claiming there’s a wedding that’s suddenly in December and no longer in November like it was last week. “Jennifer Aniston has reportedly asked friends to block out on their calendars for a very special party she’s having in December, and her pals see right through her vague invitation. Friends assume it’s code for a hush-hush wedding [with Justin Theroux]. Everyone knows what Jen is up to, but no one is calling her on it.”
OK! adds “She wants it to be an intimate, romantic beach ceremony, as opposed to her wedding to Brad Pitt, which was this huge, splashy, almost impersonal affair.” And Us Weekly refers to their behavior as the “old married couple” who sleep in and relax at home together.
IMAGE CREDIT – IN TOUCH WEEKLY MAGAZINE
